vunderba 7 hours ago

Whenever I see stuff like this, the ITX Llama [1], Pixel x86, etc. I think it's finally the time to build my ultimate love-letter to old school DOS and retro computing but always stop short because of the monitor issue.

I feel like a lot of my nostalgia likely stems from the bright super low latency phosphor displays of a proper CRT. No amount of WebGL shaders/filters [2] ever quite seem to capture the original experience IMHO.

[1] https://smallformfactor.net/news/retro-sff-itx-llama-is-a-br...

[2] https://github.com/Swordfish90/cool-retro-term

  • spankibalt 5 hours ago

    > "[...] but always stop short because of the monitor issue."

    I always stop because of the case and target audience issue. I have no interest in a tower or a pizza box, but I wouldn't be able to resist a well-designed retro industrial workstation-specced x86 machine in a metal wedge-style computer case à la Amiga 600.

  • InsideOutSanta 7 hours ago

    High-res high-refresh-rate OLEDs with modern shaders are getting close. Now somebody needs to make one that has a convex shape like an old CRT.

    I wish we'd reach a point where modern technology allows us to make new CRTs relatively easily. I don't even necessarily care about the image quality, the screens and TVs I used in my youth were never particularly good. But it doesn't seem that this will become feasible in the next few decades.

    • Telaneo 5 hours ago

      CRTs were only ever made sense to manufacture on a really big scale, so that costs could be reduced. Early tubes which weren't manufactured on such a scale were accordingly stupid expensive.

      I doubt anyone is going to spin up another factory to satisfy the potential demand, since the demand isn't that great to begin with (OLED satisfies most use-cases that CRTs do), and very few people are going to pay $5000+ for a new CRT, and I doubt they're going to be any cheaper than that.

    • numpad0 3 hours ago

      > I wish we'd reach a point where modern technology allows us to make new CRTs relatively easily.

      I have 100% confidence that we are at this point, at least for monochrome tubes. Only color tubes would be more complicated.

    • mikepurvis 5 hours ago

      Can’t you still just use a real CRT? Or is it then just back to the latency question?

      • numpad0 3 hours ago

        Who's spreading that CRT latency thing? Latencies for CRTs are in nanoseconds.

        • mikepurvis 2 hours ago

          Right but you still have the latency of frame buffers inside the emulator, plus more again when that’s converted out to analog, especially if an HDMI connector is still in the mix— ideally you’d do this on original hardware or at least a PC with a graphics card that has native s-video or VGA outputs.

          • numpad0 2 hours ago

            You only need one pixel worth of RAM to display HDMI input into a CRT. You don't need to buffer the whole thing, at all. Especially if you were driving the tube with your own driving circuit.

      • Telaneo 5 hours ago

        CRTs wear out with use, so they're only getting rarer by the day. The electronics can mostly be fixed, but the tubes can't. You can extent their lives a bit, but you're only delaying the inevitable. When it's gone (too low brightness, burn-in, bad focus), there's nothing that can be done about it to get it back to the way it was when it was new.

        • trollbridge 4 hours ago

          Every small city used to have a repair shop that could fix them.

          • bawolff 3 hours ago

            Were there really companies repairing the phospher wearing out?

            Repairing the tvs, sure, but i find it hard to believe there were repair shops for the issue parent was mentioning.

            • numpad0 an hour ago

              No. Repairing phosphors require complete removal of phosphor layers and re-application using basic multi step deposition for RGB strips, on the inner surface of the tube. That's not a shop repair.

      • treve 5 hours ago

        For me they are weirdly hard to obtain. Don't show up in second hand shops. Ebay shipping is prohibitively expensive.

        • mikepurvis 2 hours ago

          Interesting. I still have a bunch showing on my local Facebook Marketplace, but who knows what shape they’re in plus it probably varies a lot from city to city.

          I can well imagine that it’s gotten expensive finding a quality one (eg trinitron) of reasonable size.

        • mark-r 2 hours ago

          They don't show up in second hand shops because their value is essentially negative. If it doesn't sell, you have to pay to dispose it.

        • reverius42 5 hours ago

          They are truly dying out. Wish I'd kept my color c64 monitor -- it would probably be worth a lot now (or at least would be awesome to use for retro purposes).

  • AtlasBarfed 6 hours ago

    There's filters on retroarch for emulating or trying to recreate the appearance of a CRT. I have not personally tried them, but the screenshots are noticeable

jasperry 7 hours ago

Projects like this are some of my favorite uses for single-board computers. Another one is Bare Metal C64, which aims for low-latency vsynced Commodore emulation on the Pi: https://accentual.com/bmc64/

  • rcarmo 7 hours ago

    I have an original Pi with BMC64 "permanently" slotted in. It seems to work great, even though I was a Sinclair ZX81/Spectrum kid.

shreddit 8 hours ago

> Join the official Facebook group […]

Of all the things, why Facebook?

  • kwanbix 7 hours ago

    At least is not discord?

    • wkjagt 6 hours ago

      I'm totally unaware of anything related to Discord or its reputation, other than having joined a PicoCalc server (board? group) and it seems fine. What's up with Discord?

      • kwanbix 4 hours ago

        The UX is even worst than facebook groups if that is even possible.

      • exasperaited 4 hours ago

        I loathe most of Facebook, but private Facebook groups work enormously better than Discord, IMO. (Public groups are nearly worthless)

        Discord is a distracting fidgety visually overloaded place.

    • bawolff 3 hours ago

      I think most people consider discord a much better choice than fb group.

  • jhbadger 8 hours ago

    So many retro things are on Facebook. It's a stereotype that the GenX/Boomer audience interested in retrotech is on Facebook, but it's kinda true.

ok_dad 8 hours ago

> Dosbian is compatible with the following Raspberry Pi models:

I am amazed this doesn't run on literally any Pi since forever, it seems to be limited to Pi 3 and up. I have an old Pi 1B+ that I still use to host all of my websites.

  • wkjagt 6 hours ago

    I had it running on something old (a zero I think) playing with old Word Perfect and dbase. I later wanted to do the same and it no longer supported the zero. Must be some update at some point that dropped support. Too bad, I wanted to put the zero in an old mechanical keyboard.

  • zokier 7 hours ago

    I'd assume it is 64-bit, which would explain why it is limited to Pi 3 upwards

  • teaearlgraycold 7 hours ago

    Shame it doesn’t run on a Pi Zero (or at least a Zero 2).

nullbyte808 5 hours ago

Why not use https://www.freedos.org? Or boot FreeDOS straight from QEMU. Using Debian seems incredibly bloated when the goal is to use DOS. Alpine Linux would be a better base. Then you can use real DOS or a compatible one like FreeDOS.

  • reverius42 5 hours ago

    The Raspberry Pi isn't x86 (or even x86_64) so it isn't compatible -- you have to do (at least) CPU emulation to get a DOS-compatible hardware environment. You probably also want to do other hardware emulation for sound, graphics, etc. to be compatible with DOS software.

dsamy 6 hours ago

What features or games are you most excited to explore with Dosbian?

indigodaddy 8 hours ago

I was thinking how to “boot to Lode Runner” on my Pi400, so this might be close enough:)